History of CREEP and Its Role in the Watergate Scandal

CREEP was the unofficial abbreviation derisively applied to the Committee for the Re-Election of the President, a fundraising organization within the administration of President Richard Nixon. Officially abbreviated CRP, the committee was first organized in late 1970 and opened its Washington, D.C. office in the spring of 1971. Besides its infamous role in the 1972 Watergate scandal, the CRP was found to have employed money laundering and illegal slush funds in its re-election activities on the behalf of President Nixon. During the investigation of the Watergate break-in, it was shown that the CRP had illegally used $500,000 in campaign funds to pay the legal expenses of the five Watergate burglars in return for their promise to protect President Nixon, initially by remaining silent, and by giving false testimony in court — committing perjury — after their eventual indictment. Some key members of CREEP (CRP) included: John N. Mitchell - Campaign DirectorJeb Stuart Magruder - Deputy Campaign ManagerMaurice Stans - Finance ChairmanKenneth H. Dahlberg - Midwest Finance ChairmanFred LaRue - Political OperativeDonald Segretti - Political OperativeJames W. McCord - Security CoordinatorE. Howard Hunt - Campaign ConsultantG. Gordon Liddy - Campaign Member and Finance Counsel Along with the burglars themselves, CRP officials G. Gordon Liddy, E. Howard Hunt, John N. Mitchell, and other Nixon administration figures were imprisoned over the Watergate break-in and their efforts to cover it up. The CRP was also found to have had ties to the White House Plumbers. Organized on July 24, 1971, the Plumbers was a covert team officially called the White House Special Investigations Unit assigned to prevent leaks of information harmful to President Nixon, such as the Pentagon Papers to the press. Besides bringing shame on the office of President of the United States, the illegal acts of the CRP helped turn a burglary into a political scandal that would bring down an incumbent president and fuel a general mistrust of the federal government festering as part of protests against continued U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.  Ã‚   Rose Marys Baby When the Watergate affair happened, there was no law requiring a campaign to disclose the names of individual donors to political campaigns. As a result, the amount of money and individuals donating that money to CRP was a tightly held secret. In addition, corporations were secretly and illegally donating money to the campaign. Theodore Roosevelt had previously pushed through this prohibition of corporations donating money back in 1907. President Nixons secretary, Rose Mary Woods, kept the list of donors in a locked drawer. Her list famously became known as â€Å"Rose Marys Baby,† a reference to the popular 1968 horror movie titled â€Å"Rosemarys Baby.†   This list was not revealed until Fred Wertheimer, a campaign finance reform supporter forced it into the open through a successful lawsuit. Today, the Rose Mary’s Baby list can be seen at the National Archives where it is held with other Watergate-related material released in 2009. Dirty Tricks and CRP In the Watergate Scandal, political operative Donald Segretti was in charge of the many dirty tricks carried out by the CRP. These acts included the break-in at Daniel Ellsbergs psychiatrists office, the investigation of reporter Daniel Schorr, and plans by Liddy to have newspaper columnist Jack Anderson killed. Daniel Ellsberg had been behind the leak of the Pentagon Papers that had been published by the New York Times. According to Egil Krogh in an op-ed piece in the New York Times printed in 2007, he was charged along with others to carry out a covert operation that would uncover the state of Ellsbergs mental health in order to discredit him by stealing notes about him from Dr. Lewis Fieldings office. According to Krogh, the break in which found nothing about Ellsberg was done in the name of national security. Anderson was also a target due to his exposing classified documents that showed that Nixon was secretly selling arms to Pakistan in their war against India in 1971. Anderson had long been a thorn in Nixons side. The plot to discredit him was widely known after the Watergate scandal erupted. However, the plot to possibly assassinate him was not verified until Hunt confessed on his deathbed. Nixon Resigns In July 1974, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered President Nixon to turn over secretly-recorded White House audio tapes — the Watergate Tapes — containing Nixon’s conversations dealing with the Watergate break-in planning and cover-up. When Nixon first refused to turn over the tapes, the House of Representatives voted to impeach Nixon for obstruction of justice, abuse of power, criminal cover-up and several violations of the Constitution. At last, on August 5, 1974, President Nixon released the tapes, proving his complicity in the Watergate break-in and cover-up. Aware that his impeachment was almost certain, Nixon resigned on August 8 and left office the following day. Finally, on August 5, Nixon released the tapes, which provided undeniable evidence of his complicity in the Watergate crimes. In the face of almost certain impeachment by Congress, Nixon resigned in disgrace on August 8 and left office the following day. Just days after he was sworn in as president, Vice President Gerald Ford — who had no desire to run for president himself — granted Nixon a presidential pardon for any crimes he had committed while in office.

The Legacy Of The Great Gatsby By F. Rockefeller, Andrew...

One of the events that I think that formed today’s America were the men that build America which were, Cornelius Vanderbilt, John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, J.P. Morgan and Henry Ford this five legends are the one’s responsible the economic boom in the 1800’s. all the innovation made was what make the big business in America. By the development of railroads, financial systems, etc. coming from nothing this men’s create the concept of what really was the American dreams which all of us today look so desperate to accomplish. Continuing on, lets not forget that Henry Ford made possible for middle class to be able to afford a car which was called the model-t. Like it said in the mini series aired in the history channel, which by the way I have started watching twice, but never get to finish, is says the following, â€Å"America was not discovered, it was built.† That right there is a strong statement, which in fact is true this three men cha nge America for ever, and still today there name make statement anywhere. This is how they all became to be the men who built America, â€Å"Henry Ford and Thomas Edison were close friends. Another sad even that changed America on December 7, 1941 was the attack at the American naval base at Pearl Harbor near Honolulu, Hawaii. Because of this action the united state joint world war II. The Japanese destroyed an American naval vessels, battleships, and airplanes. According to an article that I read online, â€Å"2,400 Americans were

Freshman Free Essays

This can cause stress and anxiety for some people. Stress often leads to eating more and eating foods that are not as healthy. Also, if students have a hard time adjusting to college life, they may find themselves being unhappy, which could lead to drinking more and eventually gaining weight. We will write a custom essay sample on Freshman or any similar topic only for you Order Now Sometimes adjusting is extremely sad and upsetting for college freshman, which often leads to emotional eating. Exercise habits can become worse In college because students are busy and do not always have the time to worry about staying in shape. They can find themselves at class all day, studying all night, and having time to eat, but not workout. Much fewer people are student athletes in college than in high school. In high school, the teams are easier to make because it is much less competitive and more about having fun. In college, sports are intense and only a small amount of people participate in them. Therefore, these high school athletes are not getting as much exercise In college because most of them are not participating In a sport anymore, which can result In weight gain. Another cause for the freshman fifteen is the food being available at all times. College students do not have a specific time for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. The dining halls are open and filled with food all day. Some students cannot handle this and end up eating much more than they should, just because it is there and it is available to them, which they are not used to. Although there are people who will still eat healthy and restrain from overeating, several people do not have that will power and will eat every time they pass by a addling hall. The causes of gaining the Irishman fifteen are common at all colleges and universities, and students need to start eating healthier, working out more, and being conscious of their health. It is clear that the freshman fifteen is a real thing. The problems that cause this weight gain can happen at any school and that is why it is so common. Although not everyone who puts on weight in college puts on exactly fifteen pounds, it is still concerning. College students, of all people, should try to stay healthy. They are developing bad habits that could last for the rest of their lives. How to cite Freshman, Papers

Code of Ethics in Australia

Question: You are required to analysethe ethical dilemma you have identified above using use the Doing Ethics Technique (DET)? Answer: An Australian company was hiring people; a 22 year old woman named Illena from Iran has done the interview well and was hired by the company. She specializes in designing the CD ROMs. She was happy to get the job and accepted the offer immediately. When she goes for the work, she finds that she has to share the cabin with a male employee. This is because the manager has placed them together for a work and decided that they would learn things and help each other. It was important they work on a project together which will be beneficial for the company. The thing that must be noted is that she did not receive the information at the time of the interview. It was against the religious beliefs of Illena and her husband was also opposing the work. The view is that, though it is cultural perspective from the organization perspective, but the difficulty which the ICT professional was confronting was that of an ethical dilemma. More importantly, the crisis by which she confronts her manager i s such that it is addressed by the ACS Code. In this case it can be seen that Illena was faced with a ethical dilemma and she did not knew what to do. The problem was a workplace which was witnessed by me. She really faced a ethical issue as she was not clearly told about the work culture and practices (Standard of Practice, 2013). The people who were engaged in this issue were the manager of the company and the Iranian girl Illena. In this case Ileanas husband is indirectly affected with the decision, as also the male employee who was to share the project with her. There are laws likeFair Work Act 2009 that ensures that the religious and cultural practices should be maintained by the company and that no people feel distracted or harmed due to the misuse of the religious beliefs of the people in the workplace (Press.anu.edu.au, 2015). In this case it is seen that the code of ethics that guide the issues are Social Implications which includes the Enhancement of Quality of Life. It ensures that the employer of the company must work for the betterment of the people of the organization. He must ensure the safety of the people in the organization as well as look after their health. He must refrain from treating the employees unfairly and must treat the employees with respect. More over the employer must look that the employees are satisfied in their work and try to set those things that had affected the interest of the employee (ACS Code of Professional Conduct Professional Standards Board Australian Computer Society, 2015). In the above case it was seen that the women was affected by the decision of the manager. Moreover she was not rightly informed. The woman was affected by her religious beliefs and she was not able to work with a male employee. Though she was not informed about this at the time of joining, which was unethical on the part of the company and there was breech of ICT practices. The rules and regulations of the ACS codes of ethics, as well as fair work act were broken when the employee was not informed about the work culture and that the employer was not able to hold up the religious beliefs of the employee (Josephsoninstitute.org, 2015). More over the other employees work was also affected since Illena did not cooperate with the work. There is actually no one who has benefitted from the action. The company as well as the employees was affected due to the wrong decision of the employer. He should have informed Illena so she would have decided otherwise on the job. The company suffered as the woman decided to inform the manager about her problems, so the new project was delayed and hampered. It was not possible for the male employee to do the work single handedly. It is to be considered that the happiness of both the employees was lost and the company also suffered. If this is made universal, then people in all the organization will suffer as there are people of all religion and background in the company who have different values and beliefs (Igi-global.com, 2015). If the employer sets the wrongs as it is expected from them, then it will add to the benefits of all those who are concerned. Other people in the community might not see that there is any fault with the company as these issues can be dealt easily for the betterment of the society and the workplace at large. Thus it can be said there is no actual right or wrong (Australia.gov.au, 2015). The employer did not see any need to mention the work culture to Illena, as he did not think that it will create any issue for her. But it was wrong on the part of Illena as she had to face problem in the work place as well as threats from her husband. Thus which is right to someone may be wrong to others and vice versa. References ACS Code of Professional Conduct Professional Standards Board Australian Computer Society. (2015) (1st ed.). Retrieved from https://www.acs.org.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/4901/Code-of-Professional-Conduct_v2.1.pdf Australia.gov.au,. (2015).Rights | australia.gov.au. Retrieved 17 March 2015, from https://www.australia.gov.au/topics/law-and-justice/rights Igi-global.com,. (2015).Ethics and Social Issues Related to Information Communication Technology (ICT): Computer Science and Information Technology Book Chapter | IGI Global. Retrieved 17 March 2015, from https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/ethics-social-issues-related-information/43777 Josephsoninstitute.org,. (2015).Josephson Institute of Ethics: Making Ethical Decisions: The Six Pillars of Character. Retrieved 17 March 2015, from https://josephsoninstitute.org/MED/MED-2sixpillars.html Press.anu.edu.au,. (2015).'15. Ethical issues of emerging ICT applications a Euro-landscape' in Professionalism in the Information and Communication Technology Industry by Edited by John Weckert and Richard Lucas | ANU Press. Retrieved 17 March 2015, from https://press.anu.edu.au/apps/bookworm/view/Professionalism+in+the+Information+and+Communication+Technology+Industry/10791/ch15.xhtml Standard of Practice. (2013) (1st ed.). Retrieved from https://education.qld.gov.au/corporate/codeofconduct/pdfs/det-code-of-conduct-standard-of-practice.pdf